CalculatorUpdated May 2026

iGaming Tax Calculator — 70+ Jurisdictions

Compare gaming tax + CIT across Europe, US states, offshore jurisdictions, Latin America, APAC and beyond. Every figure cited to a primary regulator or tax authority — no industry blogs.

Set your annual GGR and your hold percentage. The table converts every regime to an effective % of GGR so you can compare a 5% GGR tax (Malta) against a 5.3% stake tax (Germany) honestly. Tick rows to compare up to four jurisdictions side-by-side.

Effective-rate formulae: GGR-based → rate × 1. NGR-based → rate × 0.85 (typical NGR/GGR ratio). Stake/turnover-based → rate ÷ hold (a 5.3% stake tax at 5% hold = 106% on GGR). Deposit-based → rate × deposit multiplier (≈ 20× at 5% hold — relevant for India's 28% GST regime).

Region:
73 jurisdictions shown

Tick up to 4 rows to compare

JurisdictionEffective % of GGRAnnual tax
Portugalon Sliding scale
Serviço de Regulação e Inspeção de Jogos (SRIJ)
0.0%€0
Switzerlandon Sliding scale
Eidgenössische Spielbankenkommission (ESBK)
0.0%€0
Anjouan (Comoros)on Fee-based
Anjouan Gaming Board (ABGB) under AOFA
Kahnawà:ke (Mohawk Territory)on Fee-based
Kahnawà:ke Gaming Commission (KGC)
Costa Ricaon Fee-based
No specific gaming regulator — municipal data-processing permit + Hacienda
Alderneyon Fee-based
Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC)
Nevison Fee-based
Nevis Online Gaming Authority (NOGA)
Gibraltaron GGR
Gibraltar Gambling Division
0.1%€15k
Isle of Manon GGR
Gambling Supervision Commission
1.5%€150k
Curaçaoon GGR
Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA)
2.0%€200k
Antigua & Barbudaon GGR
FSRC Directorate of Offshore Gaming
3.0%€300k
United States (federal layer)on Stake
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
5.0%€500k
Maltaon GGR
Malta Gaming Authority (MGA)
5.0%€500k
Estoniaon Net wins
Estonian Tax and Customs Board (EMTA)
5.5%€550k
South Africaon GGR
National Gambling Board (NGB) + Provincial Licensing Authorities
7.5%€750k
Belgiumon GGR
Belgian Gaming Commission
11.0%€1.1M
Iowaon GGR
Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (IRGC)
11.8%€1.2M
Nevadaon GGR
Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB)
11.8%€1.2M
Brazilon GGR
Secretaria de Prêmios e Apostas (SPA), Ministério da Fazenda
12.0%€1.2M
Australia — New South Waleson NGR
Liquor & Gaming NSW / Revenue NSW
12.8%€1.3M
Australia — Victoriaon NGR
VGCCC / State Revenue Office Victoria
12.8%€1.3M
Indianaon GGR
Indiana Gaming Commission (IGC)
14.5%€1.4M
Franceon GGR
Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ)
15.0%€1.5M
Hungaryon GGR
Szabályozott Tevékenységek Felügyeleti Hatósága (SZTFH)
15.0%€1.5M
Latviaon GGR
State Revenue Service / IAUI
15.0%€1.5M
Coloradoon GGR
Colorado Division of Gaming
15.0%€1.5M
Arizonaon GGR
Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG)
15.0%€1.5M
Nigeriaon GGR
State-level regulators (LSLB, OYSGRA, etc.) — federal NLRC nullified Nov 2024
15.0%€1.5M
Argentina — City of Buenos Aireson GGR
LOTBA SE
15.0%€1.5M
Australia — Queenslandon NGR
Queensland Revenue Office
17.0%€1.7M
Singaporeon GGR
Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA), Ministry of Home Affairs
18.0%€1.8M
West Virginiaon GGR
West Virginia Lottery Commission
20.0%€2.0M
Virginiaon GGR
Virginia Lottery (Sports Betting Department)
20.0%€2.0M
Spainon GGR
Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ)
20.0%€2.0M
Ontario (Canada)on GGR
iGaming Ontario (iGO) + AGCO
20.0%€2.0M
Chileon GGR
Superintendencia de Casinos de Juego (SCJ) — proposed scope expansion
20.0%€2.0M
Ghanaon GGR
Gaming Commission of Ghana (GCA)
20.0%€2.0M
Swedenon GGR
Spelinspektionen
22.0%€2.2M
Lithuaniaon GGR
Gaming Control Authority (LPT)
22.0%€2.2M
Slovakiaon GGR
Gambling Regulatory Authority (ÚRHH)
22.0%€2.2M
Connecticuton GGR
CT Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) — Gaming Division
23.0%€2.3M
Bulgariaon GGR
National Revenue Agency (NRA) — gambling supervision
25.0%€2.5M
Massachusettson GGR
Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC)
25.0%€2.5M
Ohioon GGR
Ohio Casino Control Commission (OCCC)
25.0%€2.5M
Marylandon GGR
Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency (MLGCA)
25.0%€2.5M
Tanzaniaon GGR
Gaming Board of Tanzania (GBT) + TRA
25.0%€2.5M
Louisianaon GGR
Louisiana Gaming Control Board (LGCB)
26.5%€2.6M
New Jerseyon GGR
NJ Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE)
27.3%€2.7M
Denmarkon GGR
Spillemyndigheden
28.0%€2.8M
Italyon GGR
Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (ADM)
28.7%€2.9M
Romaniaon GGR
Oficiul National pentru Jocuri de Noroc (ONJN)
30.0%€3.0M
Czech Republicon GGR
Ministry of Finance / Customs Administration
30.0%€3.0M
Japanon GGR
Casino Regulatory Commission (CRC) under IR Implementation Act
30.0%€3.0M
Peruon GGR
MINCETUR — DGJCMT
32.0%€3.2M
Michiganon GGR
Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB)
34.3%€3.4M
Greeceon GGR
Hellenic Gaming Commission (HGC)
35.0%€3.5M
Philippineson GGR
PAGCOR
35.0%€3.5M
Netherlandson GGR
Kansspelautoriteit (KSA)
37.8%€3.8M
Irelandon Turnover
Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland (GRAI) / Revenue Commissioners
40.0%€4.0M
Macau SARon GGR
Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ)
40.0%€4.0M
United Kingdomon GGR
UK Gambling Commission / HMRC
40.0%€4.0M
Austriaon GGR
Bundesministerium für Finanzen (BMF) / Casinos Austria monopoly
40.0%€4.0M
Tennesseeon Stake
Sports Wagering Council (SWC)
42.0%€4.2M
Illinoison GGR
Illinois Gaming Board (IGB)
45.0%€4.5M
New Yorkon GGR
New York State Gaming Commission
56.0%€5.6M
Pennsylvaniaon GGR
Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB)
59.0%€5.9M
Rhode Islandon GGR
RI Department of Business Regulation (DBR) — single vendor IGT/Bally's
66.0%€6.6M
Germanyon Stake
Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL)
106.0%€10.6M
Kenyaon GGR
Betting Control and Licensing Board (BCLB) — being replaced by GRA
115.0%€11.5M
Polandon Turnover
Ministry of Finance
240.0%€24.0M
Colombiaon GGR
Coljuegos
337.0%€33.7M
Indiaon Deposit
GST Council + Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 (Centre)
560.0%€56.0M
Mexicoon Turnover
SEGOB — DGJS
1000.0%€100.0M

Ready to move from numbers to action?

Need a real assessment for your business?

The calculator gives indicative numbers. GetBanked does the actual assessment — which banks and licences will actually work for your vertical, jurisdiction, and volume.

Methodology & sources

This calculator covers iGaming tax rates and corporate income tax in 70+ jurisdictions, sourced exclusively from primary regulators, government tax authorities, or enacted legislation. We deliberately exclude industry blogs, vendor pages, and consultancy summaries from our citations — they go out of date and frequently repeat each other's errors.

The killer insight: tax base matters more than the headline rate. A regulator quoting "5.3% gambling tax" (Germany on online slots) means something completely different from a regulator quoting "5% gaming tax" (Malta). The German rate applies to every euro wagered (stake); the Maltese rate applies only to the operator's gross retained margin (GGR). At a typical 5% sportsbook hold, that difference is 20×. The calculator's Effective column does this conversion automatically so headline rates can't mislead.

Effective rate including CIT. When you tick "Include CIT", the calculator layers corporate income tax on top of the gaming burden, assuming an EBITDA margin of 25% after gaming tax. CIT applies to operator profit, not GGR, so its absolute impact is usually modest compared to gaming tax — except where it shifts the comparison materially, such as Malta's ~5% effective CIT (after the imputation refund), Isle of Man's 0%, or Estonia's 22%-on-distribution model. For a proper P&L stack, see our GGR → EBITDA Margin Modeler.

Confidence ratings. Every row is flagged High, Medium, or Low based on the strength of the source. High = found on the regulator's or tax authority's own page within the last 12 months. Medium = recent ministry summary, Big-4 tax summary, or a regulatory change in transition. Low = thin public data; verify with local counsel before any commercial decision. Sources for each jurisdiction are linked in its expandable detail row.

Recent changes baked in. The 2024-2026 wave of European tax hikes is captured: UK Remote Gaming Duty 21% → 40% from 1 April 2026; Netherlands kansspelbelasting 30.5% → 34.2% → 37.8% (current); Sweden 18% → 22%; Denmark 20% → 28%; Bulgaria 20% → 25%; Czech 23% → 30% (or 35% on online slots); Latvia 12% → 15%; Lithuania 20% → 22%; Romania 21% → 30%. In the US: New Jersey unified online sports + iGaming at 19.75% from 1 July 2025; Illinois moved to a 20-40% sliding scale plus a per-wager surcharge; Louisiana online sports rose to 21.5%; Maryland online sports rose to 20%. Malta's major reform unifying Type 1 gaming services at 15% takes effect 1 October 2026 — currently shown at the pre-reform 5% rate.

What this calculator deliberately doesn't model: player-win withholding (UK, Ireland, India, Kenya, Ghana), VAT/GST on ancillary services, local municipal surcharges (Chicago + Cook County add 12.25% inside Illinois' sports tax structure, Detroit adds 1.25% for Michigan casino-licence iGaming), responsible-gambling levies that vary by month or revenue band, and the operational cost of tax-compliance reporting itself (a Big-4 audit for a multi-jurisdiction operator runs €100k–€500k/year). For US states, federal CIT 21% is shown as a separate levy on top of state CIT.

Cross-links. Every jurisdiction with a matching iGaming licence in our licence-cost dataset has a "See licence cost" link in the detail row. Use the two calculators together to model total cost of entering a market: setup + annual licence (from the licence calculator) plus gaming tax + CIT (from this one). The full P&L impact lives in our GGR → EBITDA Margin Modeler.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gaming tax on GGR, NGR, turnover, and stake?
GGR (gross gaming revenue) is stakes minus winnings paid out — what the house keeps before any deductions. NGR (net gaming revenue) deducts bonuses, jackpot contributions, and certain fees from GGR. Turnover and stake mean the total amount wagered. A 5% tax on GGR is much lighter than a 5% tax on stake: at a 5% hold (sportsbook margin), 5% on stake equals 100% on GGR — Germany's 5.3% stake tax on online slots is the canonical example of why headline rates mislead.
Why does the calculator show "Effective % of GGR" instead of the headline rate?
Because the headline rate is meaningless across different bases. Malta's 5% on GGR and Germany's 5.3% on stake look almost identical until you convert both to the same base. The Effective column converts every regime to "% of GGR you owe" at your stated hold, so you can compare apples to apples. Sliding-scale and fee-based jurisdictions are shown but excluded from the effective number — see their detail row for the actual cost.
How is CIT layered on top?
When you tick "Include CIT", the calculator adds corporate income tax on the residual operating profit, assuming a 25% EBITDA margin after gaming tax. This is a rough first-order estimate — your actual margin depends on bonus structure, marketing spend, PSP fees, and headcount. CIT is much smaller in absolute terms than gaming tax for most operators, but in jurisdictions like Malta the effective CIT (around 5% after the imputation refund) can flip the comparison entirely.
Why are some jurisdictions marked "Medium" or "Low" confidence?
High means the rate is published on the regulator's or tax authority's own page, verified within the last 12 months. Medium means we relied on a secondary source (government press release, ministry summary, Big-4 tax summary) because the primary regulator page was unclear or behind a paywall. Low means the rate could not be fully verified — treat as a starting point and confirm with local counsel. Click any row to see the actual sources we used.
What about US sports betting taxed on handle, not GGR?
Tennessee is the only US state currently taxing online sports betting on gross handle (1.85% since July 2023). Illinois added a per-wager tax of $0.25 / $0.50 in July 2025 on top of its 20–40% sliding GGR rate. Both are unique enough that the calculator surfaces them in the detail row — at typical sportsbook hold (5–8%), Tennessee's 1.85% handle tax is roughly equivalent to 23–37% on GGR.
Does this replace the iGaming Licence Cost calculator?
No — they complement each other. The licence cost calculator models setup + annual licence fees + compliance staffing + audit. This tax calculator models only the gaming tax and CIT burden. For total cost of running a licensed operation, use both: rows in this calculator link directly to the matching licence-cost page where one exists.
Why does the United Kingdom show 40% instead of 21%?
The Autumn Budget 2025 raised Remote Gaming Duty from 21% to 40% of profits, effective 1 April 2026. General Betting Duty for sports bookmakers stays at 15% until 1 April 2027 when it rises to 25%. The headline rate shown is the new RGD figure that applies to all online casino, slots, and bingo operators serving UK customers from April 2026 onwards. Sports bookmakers can switch to the General Betting Duty row in the detail view.

Disclaimer

This calculator is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Licence fees, tax rates, and regulatory requirements change. You must consult a qualified advisor in each relevant jurisdiction before making any commercial or investment decision. GetBanked and BMC Strategic Inc accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of these calculations.