CalculatorUpdated May 2026

EMI vs Bank: Annual Cost Comparison

Five archetypal provider profiles, ranked cheapest to most expensive at your monthly volume. With likely-acceptance flags.

Pick your monthly volume, your SEPA / SWIFT mix, and your FX share. The calculator ranks five archetypal providers by annual all-in cost — and tells you which ones will actually accept a high-risk applicant.

Your monthly profile

High-risk vertical?

Annual cost ranking

Cheapest viable: Lithuanian EMI (Tier 2)

  • Lithuanian EMI (Tier 2)

    Likely accepts

    Regulated EU EMI

    €8,300
    Annual

    Best mainstream balance — SEPA, multi-currency, accepts most high-risk verticals.

    Annual all-in cost at this volume profile. · Monthly: €650

  • Latvian EMI

    Likely accepts

    Regulated EU EMI

    €10,830
    Annual

    Slightly stricter than Lithuanian peers but stable correspondent network.

    Annual all-in cost at this volume profile. · Monthly: €840

  • Specialist High-Risk EMI

    Likely accepts

    Specialist EMI

    €17,340
    Annual

    Built for iGaming/forex/crypto. Most expensive but highest predictability.

    Annual all-in cost at this volume profile. · Monthly: €1,320

  • Offshore EMI / Bank

    Likely accepts

    Offshore

    €22,400
    Annual

    High acceptance, expensive on FX and SWIFT. Useful as backup or for sanctioned-adjacent profiles.

    Annual all-in cost at this volume profile. · Monthly: €1,700

  • EU Tier-1 Bank

    Likely declines

    Traditional bank

    €3,948
    Annual

    Cheapest if you can get in. Almost always declines high-risk verticals at first screening.

    Almost always declines high-risk applications. · Monthly: €329

Discuss these results with us.

We will look at your specific case, validate the numbers against our active banking partners, and give you a free, honest pre-approval read — usually within 24 hours.

We use your details only to follow up about this specific calculation. No newsletter, no list-sharing.

⚠ For informational purposes only. This is not legal, tax, or financial advice. Verify with a qualified advisor before acting on any output.

Ready to move from numbers to action?

Need a real assessment for your business?

The calculator gives indicative numbers. GetBanked does the actual assessment — which banks and licences will actually work for your vertical, jurisdiction, and volume.

Get free pre-approval Contact us

Methodology & sources

We model five archetypes — Lithuanian EMI (Tier 2), Latvian EMI, EU Tier-1 bank, Offshore EMI/bank, and Specialist High-Risk EMI. Fee profiles are calibrated against published rates of representative providers in each category and updated quarterly.

Cost = monthly fee × 12 + setup fee + (SEPA outgoing × per-payment fee) × 12 + (SWIFT outgoing × per-payment fee) × 12 + (volume × FX-conversion%) × FX-spread-bps.

Acceptance probability is binary in the model — high-risk applicants get a feasibility flag. Tier-1 banks decline ~92% of high-risk applicants on first screening regardless of cost; offshore and specialist EMIs accept 80%+. The "cheapest viable" tag picks the lowest-cost option that is actually feasible.

Not modelled: FX exposure on operational accounts, card-acquiring fees (separate calculator), MDR, chargeback fees, settlement timing risk. Use this to compare account-keeping cost only.

Frequently asked questions

Why is the cheapest provider not always the best choice?
EU Tier-1 banks have the lowest fees but reject ~92% of high-risk applicants at first screening. The "cheapest viable" tag picks the lowest-cost provider that will actually accept your profile.
How accurate are the fee profiles?
They are archetypes, not specific named providers. Real institutions vary ±20%. Use this to size your annual cost band, then talk to us for specific provider matches.
Why are SWIFT fees so much higher than SEPA?
SWIFT messages traverse multiple correspondent banks, each charging a fee. SEPA is a single-rail intra-EU instant or next-day transfer at near-zero marginal cost.
Should I run multiple accounts?
Yes — most high-risk operators run 2–3 in parallel: a primary EMI for ops, a backup EMI for redundancy, and sometimes an offshore account for sensitive flows. The cost difference vs running one is usually < €5k/yr.

More calculators

iGaming Licence CostGGR → NGR BreakdownBankability ScoreTax ResidencyTime-to-Bank EstimatorChargeback ThresholdsForex Broker CapitalVASP Licence SelectorMDR CalculatorRolling Reserve CostMATCH / TMF CostMCC Risk TierSubstance RequirementsCFC ExposureCapital RequirementsAML Self-AssessmentPlayer Funds ReserveGGR → EBITDA

Disclaimer

This calculator is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Licence fees, tax rates, and regulatory requirements change. You must consult a qualified advisor in each relevant jurisdiction before making any commercial or investment decision. GetBanked and BMC Strategic Inc accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of these calculations.