---
title: "B2B iGaming Aggregator Banking: SoftSwiss, Slotegrator, BetConstruct as Suppliers (2026)"
slug: b2b-game-aggregator-banking
excerpt: "How B2B game aggregators and platforms bank differently from operators: MCC codes, licence requirements, jurisdiction comparison, top supplier profiles."
category: iGaming
color: "#00D17A"
featured: false
readTime: 13 min read
publishedAt: 2026-05-14T14:00:00Z
seoTitle: "B2B iGaming Aggregator Banking (2026)"
seoDescription: "Banking for B2B iGaming aggregators: MCC, licences, jurisdiction comparison, SoftSwiss/Slotegrator/Pragmatic Play profiles. 2026 guide."
author: GetBanked Editorial Team
---

If you build, licence, or aggregate online casino games for operators rather than running a consumer-facing brand, your banking problem is genuinely different — and the industry rarely acknowledges it. You sit in a software-supplier band that banks can underwrite, but only if you can articulate exactly why your revenue is invoice-based B2B and not gambling proceeds. This guide covers how B2B suppliers — platform vendors, game aggregators, and studios — get banked in 2026, and where the friction still bites.

## Table of Contents

1. [Why B2B banking is not operator banking](#why-b2b-banking-is-not-operator-banking)
2. [The four types of B2B supplier](#the-four-types-of-b2b-supplier)
3. [MCC codes for B2B iGaming suppliers](#mcc-codes-for-b2b-igaming-suppliers)
4. [Licence requirements for B2B suppliers](#licence-requirements-for-b2b-suppliers)
5. [Supplier banking profiles](#supplier-banking-profiles)
6. [Revenue collection and FX mechanics](#revenue-collection-and-fx-mechanics)
7. [Where to incorporate as a B2B supplier](#where-to-incorporate-as-a-b2b-supplier)
8. [Banking options by stage](#banking-options-by-stage)
9. [Operational and compliance considerations](#operational-and-compliance-considerations)
10. [Distinct challenges B2B suppliers face](#distinct-challenges-b2b-suppliers-face)
11. [FAQ](#faq)
12. [Related Articles](#related-articles)

## Why B2B banking is not operator banking

A consumer-facing operator that takes player deposits is classified as **MCC** 7995 — gambling transactions. That code triggers every high-risk underwriting rule in a bank's playbook: rolling reserves, elevated **merchant discount rate**, enhanced **KYC** on the **UBO**, and frequent de-risking. By contrast, a B2B supplier — whether a platform vendor, a game aggregator, or a studio — never sees player money. The supplier invoices the operator. The operator pays the invoice. The relationship is closer to enterprise software than to casino cashier mechanics.

That distinction matters because banks underwrite **MCC** before they underwrite narrative. A correctly classified B2B supplier sits under 7372 (prepackaged software), 7392 (management consulting and PR), or 5045 (computer peripherals and software), depending on what it actually sells. Those codes do not trigger the gambling-vertical block lists most acquirers use. Chargeback exposure is also dramatically lower: B2B contracts have arbitration clauses, dispute terms, and 30-day payment cycles, not consumer push-of-a-button refunds.

The catch — and it is a real catch — is that your customers are still gambling operators. Banks performing **source of funds** review will trace your invoices to operators, and operators' deposits to players. The chain ends in gambling. So even a clean **MCC** 7372 classification does not buy you bank silence; it just changes the conversation from "we don't bank casinos" to "tell us about your customer book, your contractual safeguards, and your **AML** programme on counterparties." That is a conversation you can win. The operator's equivalent conversation is one you usually cannot.

## The four types of B2B supplier

The B2B iGaming supply chain is not one market. It is at least four distinct businesses, each with a different banking posture.

**Platform-only vendors** licence a casino or sportsbook back-office — wallet, player account management, bonus engine, **CRM**, reporting — without supplying the games themselves. SoftSwiss's platform-only product and EveryMatrix Gold are typical. Revenue is monthly licence fees plus optional add-ons. From a bank's perspective this is the cleanest profile in the supply chain: pure SaaS economics, predictable invoicing, no transaction processing.

**Game aggregators** are API hubs. They integrate hundreds of game studios into a single endpoint that an operator can plug into and instantly offer 10,000+ titles. Slotegrator's G-A product, Pariplay, and Relax Gaming's Hub are aggregators. Revenue is typically a **GGR** revenue-share on the games that get played through the aggregator's pipe. That share-of-gambling-revenue model is what makes aggregator banking harder than platform-only — the cash flow looks more gambling-adjacent even though the supplier is not handling player funds.

**Full B2B turnkey suites** combine platform, games, payment integration, **AML** tooling, and compliance support. The full SoftSwiss product and the BetConstruct turnkey package fall here. Because the vendor is now plumbing payments — even if only as integrator — banks frequently treat the supplier as half-operator. Banking is correspondingly harder.

**Game studios** build individual titles and licence them to operators directly or via aggregators. Pragmatic Play, Evolution, NetEnt, Yggdrasil, and Booming Games are studios. Their revenue is **GGR** share on each game's spin-volume across the operator network. Studios are the most legible to banks: they make software, they invoice operators, they have no payment exposure, and listed studios (Evolution, Pragmatic Play) hold Tier-1 banking relationships routinely.

## MCC codes for B2B iGaming suppliers

| Supplier type | Typical MCC | Banking band | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-only vendor | 7372 (Prepackaged Software) | Low-medium risk | Pure SaaS, no payment flow |
| Game studio | 7372 / 5816 (Digital Goods – Games) | Low-medium risk | IP-licensing model, predictable invoicing |
| Game aggregator | 7372 / 7392 | Medium risk | Rev-share on **GGR** raises source-of-funds questions |
| Full B2B turnkey suite | 7372 + 7995 components | Medium-high risk | Integrator may touch payment rails |
| White-label provider | 7995 (if operator-of-record) | High risk | If the supplier holds the licence, it is effectively an operator |

The single biggest underwriting variable is whether your contracts make you the operator of record or merely a software vendor. Operators of record — common in true white-label arrangements — get classified as gambling regardless of their internal description as "B2B." If the licence is in your name and player liability sits on your balance sheet, you are an operator. See our [white-label iGaming platform banking guide](/blog/white-label-igaming-platform-banking) for the full breakdown.

## Licence requirements for B2B suppliers

The B2B licensing landscape has tightened sharply since 2022. The default position used to be that supplying games to a licensed operator did not require its own licence; the operator's licence covered the upstream supply chain. That presumption no longer holds in most regulated European markets.

**Malta — MGA B2B Critical Gaming Supplier licence.** The [Malta Gaming Authority](https://www.mga.org.mt/) issues a separate Critical Supplier licence covering any business providing or carrying out a critical gaming supply — which includes game content, platforms, **RNG**-based outcomes, and certain back-office services. Process is roughly 12 months, comparable to a B2C application. Annual fees scale with revenue. Most serious aggregators and studios hold the MGA B2B licence because Malta's operator population is so large.

**UK — UKGC Software Supplier licence.** The [UK Gambling Commission](https://www.fca.org.uk/) is the UK conduct regulator for finance, but the gambling regulator (UKGC) requires a separate software-supplier authorisation for anyone providing gambling software to UK-licensed operators. Without it, your games cannot be offered to British players, full stop. Banking implications are minor — UK banks are reassured by a UKGC permission, but it does not unlock UK retail banking on its own.

**Italy — ADM separate B2B licence.** Italy treats B2B supply as a regulated activity in its own right; the ADM (Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli) issues B2B authorisations distinct from B2C concessions. Without one, you cannot legally supply Italian-licensed operators.

**Romania — mandatory B2B licensing since 2023.** Romania's ONJN now requires every B2B supplier — platforms, aggregators, studios — to hold a Class II licence. Suppliers without one are blocked from the Romanian market, and the regulator publishes the authorised list. This change caught several smaller aggregators off-guard in 2024.

**Spain — DGOJ supplier registration.** Spain's DGOJ requires B2B suppliers to register and to certify their products against Spanish technical standards. Registration is lighter than a full licence but still triggers ongoing reporting.

**Curaçao and offshore.** Smaller suppliers still operate from Curaçao under the new direct-licence regime, which covers B2B activity explicitly. An Anjouan or Tobique licence can also accommodate B2B supply.

Practically, a Tier-1 aggregator or studio holds MGA + UKGC + Italian + Romanian + Spanish B2B authorisations at minimum, plus certification regimes (**ISO/IEC 17025** for **RNG** test labs, GLI-19 for game maths). Banks read this stack as evidence of regulatory maturity.

## Supplier banking profiles

The realised banking footprint of the top B2B providers tells you what is achievable when the business is built correctly.

| Provider | HQ / Group | Typical banking | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SoftSwiss | Malta / Belarus origin | Maltese banks + EU EMIs | MGA-licensed, multi-jurisdiction; banked across Malta, Cyprus, and Lithuania |
| Slotegrator | Cyprus / Estonia (Russian origin) | EMIs only; specialist providers | Sanctions-related friction since 2022; Tier-1 EU banking constrained |
| BetConstruct | Armenia + multiple licensed entities | Specialist providers + Maltese banks | Banked via per-jurisdiction subsidiaries |
| Pragmatic Play | Malta (listed parent) | Tier-1 EU banks | MGA B2B + UKGC; listed-group banking access |
| Evolution | Sweden (Nasdaq Stockholm) | Tier-1 Nordic banks | Public-company status unlocks SEB / Handelsbanken |
| NetEnt | Part of Evolution since 2020 | Inherited Tier-1 banking | Group consolidation simplified its footprint |
| Yggdrasil | Malta / Sweden | Maltese banks + Nordic Tier-1 | MGA-licensed studio with mature B2B |
| EveryMatrix | Malta + Romania | Maltese banks + EU EMIs | Romanian B2B Class II authorisation |
| Booming Games | Malta | Maltese banks + EMIs | MGA-licensed independent studio |

The pattern is clear: Maltese banking — Bank of Valletta, APS Bank, Lombard Bank — is the workhorse for the iGaming supply chain, supplemented by Lithuanian **EMI**s (Paysera, Bankera) and LHV Pank in Estonia for fintech-friendly accounts. Listed studios access Tier-1 European retail banks largely because their financial reporting and audit trails reassure the bank's compliance team. Russian-origin aggregators face structural friction that no amount of restructuring has fully resolved.

## Revenue collection and FX mechanics

B2B suppliers collect revenue in a few well-defined patterns, and your banking setup needs to match the pattern.

**Pure licence fees** are the easiest case. Monthly invoices, **SEPA** or **SWIFT** receipts in EUR or USD, 30-day net terms typical. Banks treat this as standard SaaS receivables. Platform-only vendors and many studios run on this basis with selected operator clients.

**GGR revenue-share** is the dominant aggregator and studio model. Typical rates are 10–25% of **GGR** generated by the supplier's games on the operator's platform. The operator calculates the share monthly from its **GGR** reporting and remits to the supplier. Banks see this as turnover-linked compensation, not transactional gambling revenue, and underwrite it accordingly — provided the contract is clear and the operator counterparty is named and licensed.

**Hybrid white-label / turnkey** combines a setup fee, monthly platform fee, and rev-share. The supplier is closer to a payment-processing party here, especially if the contract makes the supplier the merchant of record or licensee. Banks scrutinise these arrangements hardest because the line between supplier and operator blurs.

FX exposure is the unappreciated cost. Operators are settled in EUR, USD, GBP, BRL, ZAR, INR, CAD, AUD, and twenty more currencies depending on market. Even though invoices are usually denominated in EUR or USD, the operator's hedging or settlement choices push FX exposure onto the supplier in practice. Multi-currency accounts at LHV, Wise Business, or a Maltese bank with FX desks become functionally required at scale. See the [iGaming banking guide](/blog/igaming-banking-guide) for the broader treasury picture.

## Where to incorporate as a B2B supplier

Jurisdiction choice for a B2B supplier balances three things: tax efficiency, B2B-licence availability, and the banking ecosystem that comes with it.

| Jurisdiction | Corporate tax | B2B licence | Banking | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malta | 35% headline, 6/7 refund → 5% effective | MGA Critical Supplier | BOV, APS, Lombard; EMIs | Default for serious B2B in EU |
| Cyprus | 12.5% standard; **IP box** 2.5% effective on qualifying IP | Limited B2B regime; supply EU operators | Bank of Cyprus, Hellenic; EMIs | IP-heavy studios |
| Estonia | 0% on retained; 20% on distributed | Estonia gambling regulator | LHV Pank; fintech-friendly | Bootstrapped, retain-and-reinvest model |
| Romania | 16% standard; micro-enterprise regime possible | ONJN Class II mandatory | BCR, BRD; harder for non-resident UBOs | Suppliers focused on Romanian market |
| Isle of Man | 0% corporate (most activities) | IoM GSC supplier permission | Limited; offshore-friendly | Studios with IoM-licensed customer base |
| Curaçao | 0% under E-Zone (sunset 2024); transitional | Direct CGA licence covers B2B | Specialist EMIs only | Smaller suppliers, offshore positioning |

Malta is the default for a reason. The MGA Critical Supplier licence is the single most respected B2B authorisation in the industry, Maltese banks understand the iGaming supply chain, and the 6/7 refund mechanism — which yields an effective 5% rate on properly-structured trading profits — beats most onshore alternatives. See the [Malta MGA banking guide](/blog/malta-mga-banking) for the operator-facing analogue.

Cyprus is compelling specifically for studios whose value is the IP — game maths, art, **RNG** integration. The **IP box** regime can reduce effective tax on qualifying royalty income to 2.5%. Cyprus has no mature B2B gambling-supplier regime of its own, so the entity supplies EU-licensed operators under the operator's coverage rather than holding a B2B licence locally.

Estonia's distributed-profits model rewards retain-and-reinvest businesses. LHV Pank is one of the most fintech-aware banks in the EU and routinely banks iGaming-adjacent entities. Estonia is a strong choice for a bootstrapped studio that intends to plough profits back into product.

Romania has become more attractive than its reputation suggests for suppliers with a Romanian market focus, because the ONJN B2B licence — though costly to obtain — gives a defensible position in a growing market. For broader structuring options, the [offshore corporate structuring guide](/blog/offshore-corporate-structuring) covers holding-company patterns.

## Banking options by stage

The right bank depends on volume, jurisdiction, and licence stack.

**Pre-licence / pre-revenue.** Wise Business or Revolut Business for incorporation, payroll, and small supplier payments. Both will close the account if iGaming revenue starts hitting it without notice — so plan the transition.

**Early stage (under €500K/month).** Lithuanian **EMI**s (Paysera, Bankera, Genome) accept B2B iGaming suppliers with a clean licence stack and a coherent **AML** programme. Multi-currency, **SEPA** + **SWIFT** + card issuing. Pricing is competitive but rolling reserves and pre-funding requirements appear above certain volumes.

**Growth stage (€500K–€5M/month).** LHV Pank in Estonia, APS Bank in Malta, and selected Maltese branches of BOV become realistic. These institutions can support genuine treasury operations — multi-currency, FX hedging, payroll, supplier payments at scale. Documentation requirements are substantial.

**Mature / listed.** Tier-1 European banks (SEB, Handelsbanken, Nordea, Deutsche Bank for the largest) become accessible to listed studios and to private suppliers with audited financials and decade-old licence histories. This is where Evolution and Pragmatic Play sit.

**Specialised offshore.** Black Banx, Euro Pacific Bank successors, and certain Caribbean institutions service licensed B2B providers that need offshore positioning. Pricing is high, but capacity exists. See the [best offshore banks for high-risk businesses guide](/blog/best-offshore-banks-high-risk) for an institution-by-institution view.

## Operational and compliance considerations

B2B supplier compliance has expanded materially in the past three years. Banks expect you to run an **AML** programme not only on your own business but on the operators you license to. The [Financial Action Task Force](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/) has made supply-chain due diligence an explicit expectation in its 2024 guidance, and EU **AML**6 reinforces it.

Practically, this means a B2B supplier should:

- Maintain **KYC**/**CDD** files on every operator client — incorporation documents, licence proof, **UBO** identification, sanctions screening.
- Re-screen operator clients periodically (annually at minimum, more often for higher-risk customers).
- Enforce geographic restrictions in contracts — a standard clause prohibiting the operator from offering the supplier's games to players in restricted jurisdictions (US ex regulated states, UK without UKGC licensing, France except ANJ-licensed operators, etc.).
- Audit operator compliance with these restrictions through traffic data and player-geolocation reporting.
- Hold game certifications — **RNG** certification by an **ISO/IEC 17025** accredited test lab (GLI, eCOGRA, BMM), with **RTP** declarations consistent with jurisdiction-specific minima.
- File **SAR**s on counterparty operators where appropriate; ignoring this is the fastest way to lose your **MGA** B2B licence.

A bank conducting **EDD** on a B2B supplier will ask to see this entire stack. Suppliers that can present a current, dated, auditable compliance binder get banked. Suppliers that cannot do not.

## Distinct challenges B2B suppliers face

A few recurring frictions distinguish B2B supplier banking from operator banking.

**"But your customers are gambling operators."** Even with **MCC** 7372, the bank's first-line analyst will flag your client list. The mitigation is to lead with the licence stack, the **AML** programme, and the contractual safeguards — not to obscure the customer book. Banks that genuinely cannot bank gambling-adjacent business will tell you in the first meeting; banks that can will appreciate the transparency.

**Source of funds questions.** "Where does the money come from?" is a legitimate question. The honest answer — operators pay invoices out of their gambling **GGR** — is acceptable to most specialist banks if you can also demonstrate that the operators themselves are licensed and that you do not bank with operators based in unregulated jurisdictions. Where you cannot — for example, Curaçao-only operator clients — expect more friction.

**Pricing premium.** B2B-iGaming-adjacent accounts are typically priced 1.5–3% above pure SaaS — higher monthly fees, higher transaction costs, sometimes minimum balances. Compared to operator pricing (5–15% effective cost-of-banking once reserves are included), this is still a bargain.

**Counterparty concentration.** If 60% of your revenue comes from three operators, the bank treats your business as a payment dependency on those operators. Diversifying the operator book reads better at credit committee than a concentrated book of two big names.

**Russian-origin and sanctioned-jurisdiction exposure.** Since 2022, banks apply zero-tolerance to suppliers with Russian, Belarusian, or sanctioned-jurisdiction **UBO**s. Sanctioned **PEP** exposure is a hard stop. Honest disclosure is the only path through.

**Bank de-risking cycles.** Banks de-risk B2B iGaming suppliers in waves — typically after a regulatory event or a high-profile **AML** failure. Always run primary banking at one institution and a provisioned backup at another. The [bank rejection fix guide](/blog/bank-rejection-fix) covers recovery patterns.

## FAQ

### Can I bank as a B2B game studio without a gambling licence?

In some jurisdictions yes, but it is no longer the safe default. Curaçao and several non-EU markets still allow a studio to supply licensed operators on a contracts-only basis without holding a separate B2B authorisation. In the EU — Malta, Italy, Spain, Romania — a B2B supplier licence is now required or strongly expected, and banks increasingly want to see one before opening an account. A licensed B2B status materially improves your banking options.

### Do I need a B2B licence in Malta if I supply games to MGA operators?

Yes if you are a **Critical Gaming Supplier** — which includes anyone supplying game content, platforms, or **RNG**-based outcomes. The [MGA](https://www.mga.org.mt/) defines the perimeter explicitly. Non-critical suppliers (basic IT services, marketing) do not need the licence. Almost every game studio and aggregator falls within the critical-supplier definition.

### What MCC code is my B2B platform?

Most B2B iGaming platforms classify under **MCC** 7372 (Prepackaged Software) or 5816 (Digital Goods – Games). Aggregators that take **GGR** rev-share sometimes get classified under 7392 (Management Consulting and PR). What you should not accept is **MCC** 7995, which is gambling — that signals to the acquirer that you are an operator, not a supplier, and changes the entire underwriting profile. If your acquirer is proposing 7995, push back hard or change acquirers.

### Why do banks still flag me as high-risk if I'm B2B?

Because your revenue chain ends in gambling. Even with the right **MCC**, banks performing **source of funds** review will trace your invoices upstream to operators and onwards to player deposits. The whole chain therefore touches gambling, and banks classify the relationship as gambling-adjacent. The mitigation is not to argue that the chain is irrelevant — it is to demonstrate that you have credible **AML** and counterparty controls on your end of it.

### Do I need a different bank than the operators I serve?

Almost always, yes. Banks that comfortably bank B2C operators (specialist iGaming acquirers, certain Curaçao-friendly **EMI**s) are not the institutions best suited to a SaaS-style B2B receivables book. Conversely, banks that bank B2B SaaS comfortably (LHV, APS, Lombard) generally do not bank operators. Trying to use one bank for both sides of the supply chain usually means accepting worse terms on one side or the other.

### Are Russian-origin aggregators bankable in 2026?

With significant constraints. Most have restructured around Cypriot or Estonian holding entities, but European Tier-1 banks remain reluctant. The accessible pool is specialist **EMI**s, certain Maltese institutions willing to underwrite case-by-case, and offshore providers. Sanctioned-jurisdiction **UBO** exposure is a hard stop; clean ownership and operating entities outside Russia and Belarus is the minimum bar.

## Related Articles

- [White-label iGaming platform banking](/blog/white-label-igaming-platform-banking)
- [iGaming banking guide](/blog/igaming-banking-guide)
- [Best offshore banks for high-risk businesses](/blog/best-offshore-banks-high-risk)
- [Offshore corporate structuring for high-risk businesses](/blog/offshore-corporate-structuring)
- [Malta MGA licence and business banking](/blog/malta-mga-banking)
- [iGaming licence comparison: which jurisdiction is right for you?](/blog/gaming-licence-comparison)

**CTA:** Submit a free pre-approval in 2 minutes. We respond within 24 hours.


---
Source: https://www.getbanked.co/blog/b2b-game-aggregator-banking